- Related Stories
-
Report fuels OpenOffice vs. OOXML debate
January 17, 2008 -
Office 2007 gets official mobile compatibility
December 1, 2007 -
British standards body mum on OOXML vote
September 4, 2007 -
IBM chides Microsoft over SOA
August 8, 2007 -
Microsoft document formats gain Mass. favor
July 2, 2007 -
Microsoft's document format moves up a step
April 3, 2007 -
California may adopt OpenDocument
February 28, 2007 -
Microsoft's amusing standards stance
February 22, 2007 -
Microsoft calls IBM hypocritical on document standards
February 14, 2007 -
Sun to release ODF translator for Microsoft Office
February 7, 2007 - Related Blogs
-
Sharepoint and why ODF, CDF, and other file formats may not matter much
November 25, 2007 -
Microsoft eases access to Office binary formats for OOXML
January 17, 2008 -
Analysts: Use Open XML, ODF only to make a statement
January 15, 2008
After its first attempt to have Office Open XML (OOXML) approved as an International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standard failed in September, the software giant has spared no expense to ensure that it succeeds at the ballot resolution meeting in February. Microsoft has hosted four conference calls a week with national standards bodies, and recently invited international press to a conference close to its Redmond, Wash., headquarters to set the record straight on the OOXML issue.
A stream of Microsoft executives consecutively took to the floor at the press conference to defend the company against its growing army of critics.
Several themes were reiterated.
The first was debunking the notion that there is no need for a second XML standard in the market. Advocates of the OpenDocument Format (ODF), an ISO-approved open standard XML file format developed by a consortium led by IBM and Sun Microsystems, have argued that a second standard is "redundant."
Microsoft said that there is nothing wrong with having multiple file formats. The company cannot adopt ODF in its own Office suite, it said, because it cannot migrate the legacy of billions of documents in older Microsoft formats onto it. But it does allow users to export their file in ODF format.
"Any investment we make in the future of information work has to take into account what has been done in the past," said Microsoft Office project manager Gray Knowlton. "It's very important when migrating to open file formats that we take older documents into account."
"ODF was designed to omit the functionality of existing documents," Knowlton said. "We, on the other hand, cannot start from scratch. Our customers would never accept that."
Pitching OOXML virtues
It was also argued, on several fronts, that OOXML is a superior standard to ODF.
"Many customers tell us that ODF doesn't meet their needs," said Tom Robertson, general manager of interoperability and standards at Microsoft. "It doesn't provide backwards-compatibility, nor does it reflect the rich feature set of Office 2007."
Present at the briefing was Burton Group research director Peter O'Kelly, who, in the week prior, had authored a controversial report that recommended enterprise users adopt OOXML in preference to ODF.
O'Kelly described ODF as "simplistic," while OOXML was described as "more powerful and expressive."
The Microsoft alternative, O'Kelly said, scores points for its ability to incorporate custom schemas, its wider variety of table options and its spreadsheet formula language.
"It is not that there is anything wrong with OpenOffice.org, it's just that, in large organizations, the types of things you are working with are more akin to what (Microsoft) Office can handle," O'Kelly said. "ODF is a fine open-source offering and it's a capable product but, put it side by side with the things you can do with Office 2007, and it's a very different user experience. There are things you might take for granted within Office that simply aren't there."
O'Kelly said he was "unpleasantly surprised" at the vitriol directed at his research organization since he backed Microsoft's argument.
"This is not a Microsoft-sponsored report," O'Kelly said. "We don't do any sponsored writing at all--no white papers."
Further, he said that it was "coincidental" that the report was released three working days before Microsoft's press briefing and only a few weeks away from the crucial vote.
- More from News.com on this story's topics
XML
Europe
Microsoft Office
Microsoft
See more CNET content tagged:
OpenDocument Format,
Microsoft Office,
XML,
Microsoft Office 2007,
standard





- MS dishonesty
-
by Alton Moore
January 30, 2008 7:58 AM PST
- > Why should the industry be held back by the
> lowest-common dominator of whatever is supported
> in Open Office. That's crazy
> anything-but-microsoft thinking.
No, it is the desire to establish and adhere to open and technically correct standards. MS has proven time and time again that it is a sales-driven company. The quality -- or lack thereof -- of their software shows it.
> The reason why corporation use Office is because
> everyone else is using it, and because it's a
> developement plateform for in-house solution.
Can you say "circular reasoning"?
> The format being or not an ISO standard is
> irrelevant to corporation. Your data is never
> lost when it's saved in Office format.
Are you joking? Although the clueless will always be among us, some of us computer types take our jobs seriously and attempt to do the right things for our companies.
> If critics were really serious about this
> 'lock-in' issue, then all that would be
> necessary is opening up the MS Office format,
> not have them support _another_ file format
> instead.
MS Office format is junk. We don't want to use it. ODF would support its supposedly valuable "features" if they were any more than just window dressing and lock-in ploys.
-
Reply to this comment
View
reply
-
-
1 | 2 | Next 10 Comments >>