- Related Stories
-
Report fuels OpenOffice vs. OOXML debate
January 17, 2008 -
Office 2007 gets official mobile compatibility
December 1, 2007 -
British standards body mum on OOXML vote
September 4, 2007 -
IBM chides Microsoft over SOA
August 8, 2007 -
Microsoft document formats gain Mass. favor
July 2, 2007 -
Microsoft's document format moves up a step
April 3, 2007 -
California may adopt OpenDocument
February 28, 2007 -
Microsoft's amusing standards stance
February 22, 2007 -
Microsoft calls IBM hypocritical on document standards
February 14, 2007 -
Sun to release ODF translator for Microsoft Office
February 7, 2007 - Related Blogs
-
Sharepoint and why ODF, CDF, and other file formats may not matter much
November 25, 2007 -
Microsoft eases access to Office binary formats for OOXML
January 17, 2008 -
Analysts: Use Open XML, ODF only to make a statement
January 15, 2008
(continued from previous page)
"We didn't mean to pick a fight," O'Kelly said, saying that the OOXML report was one of three in a series on document-processing technologies. "I think too many people are confusing open standards with open source. And too many people think that what's bad for Microsoft is good for the industry."
Microsoft also used the opportunity to defend itself against accusations that the company "bought votes" in an attempt to have OOXML approved as an open standard.
Robertson said Microsoft has been on an evolutionary path to move to XML-based documents for about 10 years. Thus, OOXML was far more than a "knee-jerk response" to the success of ODF within various government departments around the globe.
Users and partners had demanded, Robertson said, that Microsoft make its new XML format transparent. It was the wish of the European Commission, he added, for Microsoft to hand over control of the specification to the community through a standardization process of its choice.
Addressing 3,255 critical comments
Microsoft chose the European standards body, the European Computer Manufacturers Association, or Ecma, Robertson said, because it has a "very high standing in the community." The 50-year-old organization has worked on standards for such technologies as CD-ROM and the C& programming language.
It is certainly not unusual to then take an Ecma-approved standard through to the ISO, Robertson said, noting that "Ecma takes 90 percent of its formats through to the ISO process."
It also isn't unusual, Robertson continued, for a standard that has already been approved by a respected body to go through ISO's "fast-track" process, which halves the amount of time national standards bodies have to assess its merits.
Jean Paoli, Microsoft's senior director of XML technologies and a member of the Ecma TC45 committee charged with administrating the OOXML standard, said that TC45 has a wide base of participants, including Intel and Apple and representatives from users such as BP, Barclays Capital, and the British Library.
Paoli said that the TC45 group has worked every day since the failed September vote to rectify the standard according to the 3,255 critical comments made by national standards bodies.
Once duplications were removed, there were only 1,000 unique comments, Paoli said, the majority being editorial mistakes (such as grammatical errors). The rest were bugs he attributed to Microsoft's legacy of attempting backward-compatibility.
"There are some things in the standard that were expressed simply because we needed to move legacy documents to XML," Paoli said.
"We are preparing the future, but also migrating binary documents. Anybody that works on Wall Street would want whatever is in an Excel spreadsheet in an XLX spreadsheet. We cannot just go and change the spreadsheet used by the financial community. We need to give them a migration path to this new world of XML. We're talking about billions of documents," Paoli said.
Paoli stated that the industry, to some degree, has voted already. Apple is including OOXML as an option in its Leopard operating system, as is Adobe in InDesign and Novell in Suse Open Office. Several Linux versions are only a few steps behind.
"It obviously works," Paoli said. "Apple, Novell, Turbolinux, and Google can all do it. For somebody like Apple to bake the format into their operating system natively--it says a lot."
Brett Winterford of ZDNet Australia reported from Sydney.
- More from News.com on this story's topics
XML
Europe
Microsoft Office
Microsoft
See more CNET content tagged:
OpenDocument Format,
Microsoft Office,
XML,
Microsoft Office 2007,
standard






- MS dishonesty
-
by Alton Moore
January 30, 2008 7:58 AM PST
- > Why should the industry be held back by the
> lowest-common dominator of whatever is supported
> in Open Office. That's crazy
> anything-but-microsoft thinking.
No, it is the desire to establish and adhere to open and technically correct standards. MS has proven time and time again that it is a sales-driven company. The quality -- or lack thereof -- of their software shows it.
> The reason why corporation use Office is because
> everyone else is using it, and because it's a
> developement plateform for in-house solution.
Can you say "circular reasoning"?
> The format being or not an ISO standard is
> irrelevant to corporation. Your data is never
> lost when it's saved in Office format.
Are you joking? Although the clueless will always be among us, some of us computer types take our jobs seriously and attempt to do the right things for our companies.
> If critics were really serious about this
> 'lock-in' issue, then all that would be
> necessary is opening up the MS Office format,
> not have them support _another_ file format
> instead.
MS Office format is junk. We don't want to use it. ODF would support its supposedly valuable "features" if they were any more than just window dressing and lock-in ploys.
-
Reply to this comment
View
reply
-
-
1 | 2 | Next 10 Comments >>