- Related Stories
-
RSA 2008: Blanketing security
April 11, 2008 - Related Blogs
-
Get your hands on Vista SP1
March 18, 2008 -
Is Vista prettier in pink?
March 28, 2008 -
Nvidia to blame for many early Vista crashes
March 28, 2008
David Cross, a product unit manager at Microsoft, was the group program manager in charge of designing User Account Control (UAC), which, when activated, requires people to run Vista in standard user mode rather than having administrator privileges, and offers a prompt if they try to install a program.
"The reason we put UAC into the (Vista) platform was to annoy users--I'm serious," said Cross, speaking at the RSA Conference here Thursday. "Most users had administrator privileges on previous Windows systems and most applications needed administrator privileges to install or run."
Cross claimed that annoying users had been part of a Microsoft strategy to force independent software vendors (ISVs) to make their code more secure, as insecure code would trigger a prompt, discouraging users from executing the code.
"We needed to change the ecosystem," said Cross. "UAC is changing the ISV ecosystem; applications are getting more secure. This was our target--to change the ecosystem. The fact is that there are fewer applications causing prompts. Eighty percent of the prompts were caused by 10 apps, some from ISVs and some from Microsoft. Sixty-six percent of sessions now have no prompts," said Cross.
Cross claimed it is a myth that users just turn UAC off, saying that Microsoft had collected opt-in information from users that showed that 88 percent were running UAC. Cross said it was also a myth that users blindly accept prompts without reading them.
"It's a myth that users click 'yes,' 'yes,' 'yes,' 'yes,'" said Cross. "Seven percent of all prompts are canceled. Users are not just saying 'yes.'"
Security company Kaspersky has severely criticized UAC, claiming in March last year that it would make Vista less secure than Windows XP.
At this year's RSA Conference, however, the security specialist seemed to have changed its tune. With Windows, "there is a large attack surface with a number of entry points," said Jeff Aliber, Kaspersky's U.S. senior director of product marketing. "Anyone trying to shrink that attack surface and promote secure apps development has to be a good thing."
Prior to the launch of Vista, Kaspersky issued a report in January 2007 that said UAC would be ineffectual. The company claimed that many applications perform harmless actions that, in a security context, can appear to be malicious. As UAC flashes up a warning every time such an action is performed, Kaspersky said that users would be forced to either blindly ignore the warning and allow the action to be performed or disable the feature to stop themselves from going "crazy."
Tom Espiner of ZDNet UK reported from San Francisco.
Click here for more stories on RSA 2008.
- More from News.com on this story's topics
RSA Conference
Security
Windows Vista
Microsoft
See more CNET content tagged:
prompt,
ISV,
myth,
secure,
ecosystem




- I payed big bucks to be annoyed!
-
by Ted Miller
April 12, 2008 5:19 AM PDT
- And annoyed I am! I sure got my annoyence dollars worth here. I am a Microsoft user and something of an IT guy here at my job. I use XP at work and Vista at home. The company has already decided to use Linux on their ITX computers that are embedded into machines for the bio research industry (Yup they used to use Microsoft), and are recoding all software from C++ to Java (Yup, we are having great success with Java for running machines). Why did I say this? Well this means a beginning of business lost from Microsoft for letting us down. It was not because Linux and Java are free, Its because Microsft is letting us down BIG time!
I liked Microsoft, I really did, but boy did you let me down in a god awful way with your "strong arm bulling ways". And now the truth come out that you RIPPED me off, and I am nolonger just annoyed I am very angry. If big business can find the backbone to take the lead towards Linux I will soon follow. I will with out fail DeMicrosoft all my computers.
By the way, the "zipping and unzipping" of files in Vista taking such a long time, was that ment to annoy me also? As a matter of fact the GUIless (Well partial GUI)defragmentation not showing details, was that supposed to annoy me also? Oh wait a minute, just one more thing all those applications like OCR programs that worked excellant in XP, but not Vista, was that supposed to annoy me also? Oh for crying out load, Just one more thing, All that money I spent to get the 2.3 rated Vista computer to a 5.9 rating, was that supposed to annoy me also? Oh man, I am trying to finish this and just relized one more annoying thing, and that is, in the end, are you going to leave me hanging, like you hung all the Windows ME users (Me as one of them)by rushing out Windows 7 next year? You fooled me twice and shame on me for being a devoted fan of yours, and for being stupid enough to be still one. Boy do I really suck.
-
Reply to this comment
View
reply
-
-
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Next 10 Comments >>