'Micro' wind turbines are coming to town

A handful of start-ups are floating an idea that could change the face of the wind power industry.

Rather than build farms of towering wind turbines in rural areas, some companies are designing "micro," or small-scale, turbines that fit on top of buildings. The idea is to generate electricity from wind in urban or suburban settings.

"We want to integrate these small wind turbines on buildings in plain sight," said Paul Glenney, director of energy initiatives at Monrovia, Calif.-based AeroVironment. "We think this can really communicate the generation of clean electricity."

News.context

What's new:
A handful of "micro" wind turbine companies are trying to bring small-scale wind power generation to urban and suburban settings.

Bottom line:
On-building wind turbines are still an emerging technology, but they could fill a viable niche among different products for generating energy.

More stories on clean technologies

In their pitch for the technology, the companies are going beyond satisfying the growing interest in clean forms of energy. AeroVironment, Aerotecture and a handful of other businesses are marketing their turbines not just as power generators, but also as attractive additions to existing structures.

Right now, giant turbines built by the likes of GE Energy and Siemens are still the norm in the wind power industry, and on-building versions are rare. Newcomers are trying different tacks to break into the market. While some such as Clipper Windpower are producing entire devices, others are focusing on providing specific components of a turbine.

"We're tracking over 20 different emerging wind technology companies in our proprietary deals database, and that list keeps growing," said Robert Day, a partner at Expansion Capital Partners which specializes in clean technologies.

Overall, the wind industry is booming, experts said. The American Wind Energy Association said that last year 2,500 megawatts of new generation equipment were installed in 22 states, valued at $3 billion.

Wind architecture
AeroVironment, which is perhaps best known for its unmanned aircraft technologies, has a project under development from its Architectural Wind energy technology division.

The turbines look like large fans in square housings. They are specifically designed for placement on the top of steel-reinforced, flat-roofed commercial buildings such as a warehouse or "big box" retail store like Home Depot, Glenney said.

The turbines can be lined up next to each other to aggregate power generation, and the fans will spin even in a very slow wind of a few miles an hour.

micro wind turbines

The company has set up a few beta sites to test various factors, including its cost-effectiveness, the amount of noise it generates, and the potential impact on birds and bats (the turbines have a grate on both sides).

AeroVironment has not yet decided whether to commercialize the products. But in presentations with potential customers, the company has gotten a good reception, Glenney said. Business owners and municipalities are eager to find sources of clean electricity for a variety of reasons, including concerns over global warming and dependence on oil from unstable parts of the world.

"Lots of companies just want to reduce the footprint that a business leaves" on the planet, Glenney said. "And they want to educate their stakeholders--their customers, their pupils--on these issues."

Chicago-based Aerotecture is taking a similar "architectural" approach to wind power generation, although with a substantially different design.

Invented by University of Illinois professor Bil Becker, the company's Aeroturbine product uses a helix-shaped turbine placed inside of a cylinder. The turbines, which are 10 feet long, can be placed in many positions and take advantage of variable wind, according to the company.

"It's not fussy about gusty or turbulent winds. It's very amenable. It's the microclimate of the building that you have to look at," said Lesleigh Lippitt, co-founder of Aerotecture.

The company, which is in the process of commercializing the product, is negotiating with Chicago city officials over an installation at the Daley Center, which would set Aeroturbines at the top of the 650-foot building, she said. Other placements are under discussion, including underneath San Francisco's Golden Gate Bridge, Lippitt said.

Other companies building similar micro wind products for urban or suburban areas include Finland's Windside, and the U.K.'s Windsave and Renewable Devices. There's also a product line called Urban Turbines, from Dutch company Ecofys.

Also on the market are several turbine products, such as Southwest Windpower, designed for remote homes or boats.

Mix and match
Expansion Capital's Day said that small-scale wind technologies have a viable role in the bigger picture of power generation.

Placing a 300-foot high turbine in downtown San Francisco is problematic. But distributed, or on-site, electricity generation systems can help customers get around the transmission bottlenecks and reliability problems of the wholesale electricity grid, Day said.

He added that even small-scale turbines are not immune to the challenges that the overall wind industry faces, such as concerns over noise and cost efficiency.

CONTINUED: Not in my backyard...
Page 1 | 2
More from News.com on this story's topics

Environment and Energy

Create an email alert | RSS feed

Industries

Create an email alert | RSS feed

General Electric

Create an email alert | RSS feed

See more CNET content tagged:
turbine, AeroVironment, wind power, General Electric Co., electricity

Add a Comment (Log in or register) 53 comments (Page 1 of 2)
Very cool
by Blito February 10, 2006 4:53 AM PST
If everyone just did a little hear and there it will never be perfect but I think overall we can have a very futuristic society that works hopefully. Only thing about too many wind generators is I am afraid it could mess with wind patterns but I'm not sure. Probably not.
Reply to this comment View all 3 replies
Did you get this story from a press release, or what?
by 208mbrandon February 10, 2006 7:17 AM PST
I am a blogger, investor, clean tech enthusiast myself. I absolutely hate it when clean techs are profiled, and there is no discussion as to the economics. All clean technology must be judged on its competitiveness with the fossil-based alternatives currently in place. Yes, we know it will have a premium right now, as most of them are in the early stages. But, how much of one? With non-energy techs such as software, communications, semiconductors, etc., there are other useful metrics that can make it compelling. With energy, it is cost/kwh. The coolness factor doesn't cut it in this field. So... Please help us with some of the following metrics: * Cost of the unit * Expected power output of the unit * Expected lifespan of the unit * Maintenance or other ongoing costs * Cost per kw/h. (This can be derived with the above metrics) * In the case of wind techs, please also give us the avg. wind speed required to achieve these metrics This piece looks as if it could have been copied from the company brochure. I am not denigrating the product, the idea, or the business model. Unless we have these metrics, there is no way to evaluate. Mark Brandon Sustainable Log - News and Views for Socially Responsible Investors http://sustainablelog.blogspot.com http://www.firstsustainable.com When you subscribe to Sustainable Log, we give $1 to Alternative Gifts International in support of a cause of your choice.
Reply to this comment View all 3 replies
World trade center anyone
by swwg69 February 10, 2006 7:46 AM PST
A wind mill on top of the new world trade center would send a signal to the oil producers. Get the power generation close to the use. Putting it on top of an existing skyscraper should not be a NIMBY problem. Putting them on a pristine landscape that is a problem. How about a home windmill to recharge the Prius.
Reply to this comment View reply
Nano turbines
by February 10, 2006 7:56 AM PST
We should have nano scale wind turbines. Imagine a nano wind turbine shirt that constantly recharges your mobile phone ;-)
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
Would you own a windmill?
by knobsturner February 10, 2006 10:49 AM PST
Would You Own a Windmill? Cost $2 million. Expected return on investment ~ about 15% sounds good for a large corporation. So that means that a wind turbine just has to clear about $300,000 per year to make money. Easy. After all wind is free. 1.5 MW turbines stand 40 stories tall, but on average you can expect to only get about 20% or so use out of them - the rest of the time the wind is not blowing, or they are down for maintenance. They run 365 days per year, 24 hours per day * 20% of the time, so 1752 hours per year. Electricity costs 10 cents per kwh at home, but 1/2 of that is for transmission. The other 5 cents is for the power. 5 cents is the retail price. You will only get 2 to 3 cents, as you own a source of electricity that can't be turned on on demand. Say 2.5 cents. In total your $2 million investment makes 1.5MW*365*24*20%*0.025 = $66 thousand per year. Wow, that is not much money. But you still have to maintain the turbine. Good luck doing that for $50 thousand a year, after lightning, wind and sun do their damage. So you might break even. Why, then all the turbines going up in the US? The answer is government money - $300 000 of it per turbine per year. So now you are happy. You get cheques, depreciation allowances, tax breaks, and more. It won't be easy. You will have to spend many hours at local and federal governments. Flights to Washington. But if your company is named GE you will succeed.
Reply to this comment View reply
Mini Distributed Wind Turbines
by Uncle Frank February 10, 2006 11:17 AM PST
Funny, I was just thinking that wind turbines should be small, and absolutely everywhere. Like distributed or grid computing (Human Proteome Folding, SETI, Cancer Busters, etc) you have millions of PCs running small tasks that, put together generates more processing power than the most powerful supercomputers in existence. I believe you can apply the same principle to produce energy from mini turbines that are connected to the power grid and feed it whenever it generates some power. Are we on to something? every single transmission tower, telephone and electricity pole should have at least one on top of it (and feed the grid directly), in fact every single structure should have one. This principle would apply to any form of energy production from mini solar panels (everywhere) to hydroelectric : taping energy from water in pipes and storm drains and sewers. I've also seen special speed bumps on roads that generate energy when a car goes over them... so many intersections with heavy traffic will generate a great deal of energy. You should be able to charge your Ipod just by walking, really. Any Venture Capitalists reading this Article Out There!
Reply to this comment
Wind power is future
by Noreast February 10, 2006 1:03 PM PST
I believe the only drawback - if too many of these were installed - would be the noise.
Reply to this comment View reply
make 'em pretty!
by jhencken February 10, 2006 3:36 PM PST
I'm all for wind power if it is ecologically sound (surely there are computer models which will forecast the effects of harnessing X amount of wind in a given area). But please don't let them be UGLY, as most things designed by engineers are! Get the group that designs Mac products to work on something that will harness the wind AND enhance the beauty of rooflines! It can be done!!
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
Dead Birds
by grangerfx February 10, 2006 7:40 PM PST
How many dead and dieing birds will we find under these micro turbines?
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
It's a nice idea...
by nightveil February 10, 2006 11:09 PM PST
Unfortunately, there's no real practical application that will allow for the massive use of wind power in the United States. They're good as a supplemental system, but the cost per Megawatt is too high to be sustatinable as a mainline solution. Neither is solar power for much the same reasons. What needs to happen is for fusion power, preferably cold fusion, to be advanced far enough to allow for fusion plants to be built inexpensively and efficiently.
Reply to this comment
1 | 2 | Next 10 Comments >>
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement
RSS Feeds
Add headlines from CNET News.com to your homepage or feedreader.
Google
Yahoo
MSN
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Today's Top Stories
Cashing in on taking digital photos of strangers
iPhone 3G queue forms in Manhattan
Privacy advocates praise Google's new link
Photos: U.S. Army names its best inventions
Photos: Top 10 reviews of the week
Most Popular Stories
Photos: Army designates year's best inventions
Photos: Top 10 newly discovered species
Photos: Cracking Open the Apple Macintosh Classic
Photos: Top 10 reviews of the week
Source: Protective order will keep Viacom out of sensitive YouTube user data
Markets

Market news, charts, SEC filings, and more

Related quotes

General Electric (1.51%) 0.40 26.91
Dow Jones Industrials (0.00%) 0.00 11,288.54
S&P 500 (0.00%) 0.00 1,262.90
NASDAQ (-0.27%) -6.08 2,245.38
CNET TECH (0.00%) 0.00 1,580.18
  Symbol Lookup
Detroit auto show
Detroit auto show

Detroit auto show
advertisement
On MovieTome: TRANSFORMERS 2 SPOILERS!
Advanced
search
Advanced
search
Visit other CBS Interactive sites