ISO calls for end to Open XML 'personal attacks'

The International Organization for Standardization has called for "personal attacks" to cease in the debate surrounding Microsoft's Office Open XML standard.

The move came as an ISO committee meeting in Norway attracted protesters, who gathered to call for the retraction of Open Office XML (OOXML) from the ISO standardization process.

At the start of April, the document format won enough votes to become a fully fledged ISO standard. Many observers had been against that standardization, pointing out that the OpenDocument Format (ODF) already existed as an ISO standard, and arguing that OOXML's documentation contained too many unanswered technical problems to be passed.

Last week the ISO committee in charge of document standards, SC 34, met in Oslo to discuss the way forward for OOXML and ODF. The plenary session was marked by protests outside, largely carried out by delegates from a nearby open-source conference. The protesters were calling for OOXML to be withdrawn from ISO standardization--something that could theoretically happen if a national standards body were to protest against its own vote within the next month or two.

One result of the SC 34 meeting was an open letter, signed by 30 members, which read: "We the undersigned participants at this SC 34 meeting wish to make it clear that we deplore the personal attacks that have been made during the (OOXML) standardization project in recent months. We believe standards debate should always be carried out with respect for all parties, even when they strongly disagree. We call on all organizations and individuals involved in SC 34 standardization to support this view, and to refrain from initiating or engaging in any such personal attacks."

The committee passed several resolutions relating to OOXML. The most significant was the establishment of an ad hoc working group to "maintain" the standard. This is a temporary measure, as the committee foresees the need for three document standard-related working groups: one to maintain OOXML, one to maintain ODF, and one to "work on interoperability/harmonization" between the two.

Another ad hoc group will also become operational in three months' time, collecting reports of "possible editorial or technical defects" in OOXML from national standards bodies, "liaison organizations," and the general public.

All members of the SC 34 committee will have to be given access to the final text of the OOXML standard by May 1 at the latest, the meeting also resolved.

David Meyer of ZDNet UK reported from London.

More from News.com on this story's topics

XML

Create an email alert | RSS feed

Europe

Create an email alert | RSS feed

See more CNET content tagged:
OpenDocument Format, standardization, committee, Oslo, XML

Add a Comment (Log in or register) 20 comments (Page 1 of 2)
Ghee Whiz, If The Thing (OOXML) Is Like A Pig In A Barrel....
by Commander_Spock April 15, 2008 10:00 AM PDT
... then let us say so. Why try to "hush/stifle" other people's expressions/impressions/views. :-( One result of the SC 34 meeting was an open letter, signed by 30 members, which read: "We the undersigned participants at this SC 34 meeting wish to make it clear that we deplore the personal attacks that have been made during the (OOXML) standardization project in recent months. We believe standards debate should always be carried out with respect for all parties, even when they strongly disagree. We call on all organizations and individuals involved in SC 34 standardization to support this view, and to refrain from initiating or engaging in any such personal attacks." Read the subject line. And, remember that: "It Is Not Going To Be Over Until The Fat Lady Sings"! ;-)
Reply to this comment View reply
Agreed with ISO
by cmwendy April 15, 2008 10:17 AM PDT
It's time to get on with the roll out, and end the divisiveness.
Reply to this comment View reply
At least start an investigation
by jeromatron April 15, 2008 10:53 AM PDT
I think that the ISO at least needs to open an investigation considering the irregularities with the vote in so many places and ways.
Reply to this comment
All of this could just be Microsoft's own fault!
by Commander_Spock April 15, 2008 11:14 AM PDT
They had a very good chance to sit down with the Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards (OASIS) Group way back then when the two groups involved would have gotten the opportunity to iron out all the interoperability issues and they did not; (now, look where this is now being addressed - at the ISO) and the story is as simple as that.
Reply to this comment
interoperability/harmonization working group.
by My-Self April 15, 2008 12:25 PM PDT
I wish them the best of lucks, as OOXML is designed from the ground up to prevent interoperability and force the use of Microsoft owned patents. This working group must be a joke !
Reply to this comment View reply
"OOXML's Integrity Tests" or "'personal attacks'"?
by Commander_Spock April 15, 2008 1:29 PM PDT
Which one is it? :-$ ;-)
Reply to this comment
ISO has nothing to do with this article.
by rsnic April 15, 2008 2:00 PM PDT
This open letter is nothing to do with ISO. So what 30 people who have voted for a standard in an ISO process do not represent ISO. This Open XML process was the worst thing to happen to ISO. It has brought disrepute on the whole organisation, that you can fast track a process, override 2000+ problems that were raised by participanting standards bodies, openly bribe members and use backhanded tricks to discredit specific countries local standards bodies. ISO now have a lot of work to do it in reevaluating their procedures.
Reply to this comment View reply
amusing
by Dalkorian April 15, 2008 4:29 PM PDT
Now isn't this amusing. The ISO has basically prostituted themselves to the evil empire and now this ISO committee wants respect? People don't generally respect prostitutes. Do they consider that a "personal attack"? Maybe they could try answering the questions they left blank, like why on earth they would approve an "open standard" that's 6,000 pages and refers to patented and proprietary closed standards throughout. Or maybe why a 6,000 page document needed to be fast tracked to begin with.
Reply to this comment
ISO is useless
by flemingho April 15, 2008 6:51 PM PDT
..for obseleting the "last current" standard, and having another one. Why do they bother calling it a standard or even have a so called "standards" organization? We're all going to be chasing another standard a few years from now. Corporate facisism wins again.
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
ISO or I$0
by t8 April 16, 2008 3:07 AM PDT
Did Microsoft money sway the vote? I wouldn't put it past Microsoft to have done this. I just can't trust them and to make them a standard bearer is just ludicrous. ISO lost any authority they had with this stupid move.
Reply to this comment
1 | 2 | Next 10 Comments >>
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement
RSS Feeds
Add headlines from CNET News.com to your homepage or feedreader.
Google
Yahoo
MSN
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Today's Top Stories
Google adds privacy policy link to home page
Photos: Take a trip inside the Mac Classic
1 euro eBay baby goes home
Down to earth with the Blue Angels
Ask.com closes Dictionary.com deal
Most Popular Stories
'Netflix box' to carry more than just Netflix
Jobs, Apple directors face new backdating suit
IE 8 to have antimalware protection
Photos: Cracking Open the Apple Macintosh Classic
Source: Protective order will keep Viacom out of sensitive YouTube user data
Markets

Market news, charts, SEC filings, and more

Related quotes

Dow Jones Industrials (0.00%) 0.00 11,288.54
S&P 500 (0.00%) 0.00 1,262.90
NASDAQ (-0.27%) -6.08 2,245.38
CNET TECH (0.00%) 0.00 1,580.18
  Symbol Lookup
Detroit auto show
Detroit auto show

Detroit auto show
advertisement
On TechRepublic: 19 words you don't want in your resume
Advanced
search
Advanced
search
Visit other CBS Interactive sites