Dell opts for AMD's Opteron

update Dell has agreed to use Advanced Micro Devices' Opteron chip in multiprocessor servers by the end of the year, ending a long-standing policy of sticking exclusively with Intel.

The PC maker made the move public in its first-quarter earnings press release on Thursday. Speculation has mounted for years as to whether Dell would adopt the company's chips, despite Dell's exclusive relationship with rival Intel to this point. AMD has enjoyed a performance lead in server benchmarks over Intel's Xeon processors.

"We welcome Dell, and Dell customers, to the world of AMD64," Marty Seyer, an AMD senior vice president for commercial business, said in a statement distributed after Dell's earnings release.

Although the deal is confined to servers at this point--and it's not clear exactly when the servers will arrive, other than before the end of the year--it still represents another win for AMD, which has had a long string of gains over its rival. Intel's earnings and stock price have suffered in recent quarters, due in part to AMD's increasing market share.

Dell's decision to abandon its longstanding all-Intel policy comes amid less-than-stellar earnings for its first quarter. The results were in line with the warning the company provided last week. Revenue was $14.2 billion, up 6 percent from last year, but net income slid 18 percent to $762 million. Dell said it's no longer giving specific quarterly financial guidance, though it did say the second quarter should be similar to the first.

Earlier this week, company founder Michael Dell admitted the PC seller's performance over the last year had been disappointing. "I think there are lots of opportunities for us to do quite a bit better than we did last year," he said at the Future in Review conference Monday. "We didn't recognize how competitive the market was going to be." In hopes of getting back on the right track, Dell will accelerate plans for $3 billion in cost cuts and will spend $100 million on improving its customer service, CEO Kevin Rollins said Thursday.

The cost cuts will come from improving the efficiency of its support and manufacturing processes, Rollins said on a conference call following the earnings announcement. "We'll have the flexibility to price more effectively," he said, adding there are no plans for job cuts.

First embrace
Rollins said Dell's initial embrace of AMD will only involve servers with four processors--a relatively small category of the server market. There are no plans to sell AMD's chips in desktop PCs, notebooks or other servers at this time, he said.

"Our customers expressed a desire for that technology," Rollins said, referring to Opteron. "We will still be launching this year a broad base of Intel products."

CNET prizefight
AMD vs. Intel
Dual-core desktop CPUs go head-to-head

In an interview later on Thursday, AMD's Seyer said that the company has been demonstrating its technology to Dell for years.

"I've replaced a third set of tires on my car going back and forth" over the past four years, he said.

Several times during the last few years, Rollins has hinted that the company was right around the corner from introducing products based on AMD's chips. Ever since AMD introduced Opteron in 2003, the processor has enjoyed an advantage over Intel's Xeon. During an extended period in 2005, server vendors Hewlett-Packard, Sun Microsystems and IBM were shipping dual-core versions of the Opteron processor, and Dell could offer only single-core Xeon processors.

AMD's progress on the Dell account, though, was steady. When AMD took over 10 percent of the market for Intel-AMD chips in early 2005, it was a pivotal point for establishing AMD's credibility among business buyers. Some government customers also began to specify that they wanted "Opteron or equivalent" servers in the bid proposals, Seyer said.

"In the second half of 2005, Dell's customers began to speak quite loudly about Opteron," he said.

Sources close to AMD, however, said a deal between Dell and AMD wasn't signed until this year.

More from News.com on this story's topics

Earnings

Create an email alert | RSS feed

Consumer hardware

RSS feed

Hardware servers

Create an email alert | RSS feed

Processors

Create an email alert | RSS feed

Multiprocessor servers

Create an email alert | RSS feed

Dell

Create an email alert | RSS feed

Intel

Create an email alert | RSS feed

Advanced Micro Devices

Create an email alert | RSS feed

See more CNET content tagged:
Kevin Rollins, AMD, AMD Opteron, Intel Xeon, multiprocessor

Add a Comment (Log in or register) 32 comments (Page 1 of 2)
YES!!!!! THEY DID IT :)
by nap1805 May 18, 2006 2:36 PM PDT
WELL... What to say about it, except that it was long overdue! Good, finally some meaning out of it.

Let's have a fair market competition, K8L against whatever Intel is cooking!

Nap.
Reply to this comment
The right move at the wrong time.
by Dachi May 18, 2006 2:38 PM PDT
They were too good for AMD while they were on their way up and living the good life, now at the first sign of trouble and as people are starting to lose interest they embrace it.

They are not offering AMD becasue they want to but becasue they feel they have no other choice.

I wonder if this "me too" sentiment is going to extend to their AMD line of servers?

This was the right move at the wrong time.
Reply to this comment
A ltitle late
by M A May 18, 2006 2:50 PM PDT
A year ago I was shopping for a new server for my company, & I had wanted one with an AMD Opteron. Although Dell was trying to be competitive pricewise, their lack of any AMD Opteron servers left me with the decision to shop elsewhere. I suppose I can check them out again next time I need to shop for a server.

Bottom line, vote with your wallet!
Reply to this comment
amd should suddenly get 'constrained' on dell orders...
by Yukimi Konomi May 18, 2006 3:05 PM PDT
at least at the start, a nice gift for their buddies over at HP who actually sell their products without their arms twisted behind their backs...
Reply to this comment
Too Little... Too Late
by alqaqish May 18, 2006 3:41 PM PDT
The fact that it has taken Dell this long to offer AMD chips in its systems is absolutely gross neglegence on their part.

"Our customers expressed a desire for that technology," Rollins said, referring to Opteron.

Mr. Rollins your customers have been screaming for AMD chips for years! The fact that you are only offering the chips in servers and not desktops and laptops only demonstrates that Dell has lost touch with its customers and that you don't really care what you're customers are asking for.

By the way, maybe Mr. Rollins can tell us when Dells business model changed from taking care of customers to taking care of vendors?
Reply to this comment View reply
Dell is about to get better
by IndioITMan May 18, 2006 3:57 PM PDT
I can't wait for the number one producer of PC's on the planet to start offering REAL gaming machines, with AMDx2 processors...and for those of you who said hades would freeze over before this ever happened: check your thermastats...it's suddenly getting cooler...
Reply to this comment View all 4 replies
Illuminata is pretty dim
by scdecade May 18, 2006 4:36 PM PDT
>>>...said Gordon Haff, an analyst at Illuminata. "If you're going to introduce an alien product into your line, logically you might do it where your highest volume is."<<<

In this case logically not.

a) AMD couldn't supply Dell's 2 way server volume. Why disappoint customers with long waits?
b) AMD systems require far fewer parts. In the case of 4 way servers the advantage is about 4x. Here's where Dell will get the biggest margin boost.

There are other reason's it makes sense too.
Reply to this comment View reply
So what.
by ServedUp May 18, 2006 4:43 PM PDT
Dell has already been using there chips already in some of its
server products.

What makes this such a big deal? Their probably getting a better
buying deal from AMD than Intel would ever give them.

So what? Dell's saving money. Big Deal.
Reply to this comment View reply
So what?
by ServedUp May 18, 2006 4:45 PM PDT
Dell has already been using there chips already in some of its
server products.

What makes this such a big deal? Their probably getting a better
buying deal from AMD than Intel would ever give them.

So what? Dell's saving money. Big Deal.
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
A monopoly is born
by Reader11 May 18, 2006 7:56 PM PDT
Great business desision computers are a commodity now anyway. The cheaper the better. This makes it much easier to decide for the average Joe which computer to buy.
Reply to this comment
1 | 2 | Next 10 Comments >>
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement
RSS Feeds
Add headlines from CNET News.com to your homepage or feedreader.
Google
Yahoo
MSN
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Today's Top Stories
YouTube can't blame Viacom for ad woes
DailyCandy and the blogs-to-books trend
Reviewers find iPhone 3G fast, pretty, and hungry
Bank of America may finally support Firefox
DreamWorks exec on why it bumped AMD for Intel
Most Popular Stories
Photos: Top 10 newly discovered species
T-Mobile rumored to be readying Android phone for 3G launch
Photos: Supercomputing at Oak Ridge
3G iPhone up for grabs online--or is it?
Geeks get a word in with Merriam-Webster
Markets

Market news, charts, SEC filings, and more

Related quotes

Dell (0.00%) 0.00 22.63
Intel (0.00%) 0.00 20.92
Advanced Micro Devices (0.00%) 0.00 5.53
Dow Jones Industrials (1.36%) 152.25 11,384.21
S&P 500 (1.71%) 21.39 1,273.70
NASDAQ (2.28%) 51.12 2,294.44
CNET TECH (0.97%) 15.41 1,604.34
  Symbol Lookup



advertisement
On GameSpot: Wii Fit tells 10-year-old she's fat
Advanced
search
Advanced
search
Visit other CBS Interactive sites