Apple plugs QuickTime zero-day flaw

Apple on Tuesday released a QuickTime update to fix a security flaw that was used to breach a MacBook Pro at a recent security conference.

The media player vulnerability lies in QuickTime for Java, Apple said in a security alert. The hole could be exploited through a rigged Web site and let an attacker commandeer computers running both Mac OS X and Windows, the Mac maker said.

"By enticing a user to visit a Web page containing a maliciously crafted Java applet, an attacker can trigger the issue, which may lead to arbitrary code execution," Apple said. Only computers running an unfixed version of QuickTime would be at risk.

Security monitoring company Secunia deems the flaw "highly critical," one notch below its most serious rating. The update, QuickTime 7.1.6, repairs the problem by performing additional checking. Apple credits bug hunter Dino Dai Zovi and the TippingPoint Zero Day Initiative for reporting the issue.

Apple's fix comes just over a week after the vulnerability was used to grab a $10,000 prize and a MacBook Pro in a hack-a-Mac contest at the CanSecWest conference in Vancouver, British Columbia.

Security researcher Shane Macaulay worked with Dai Zovi to break into the Mac and took home the computer. Dai Zovi subsequently submitted the bug to TippingPoint, which sweetened the competition by offering a $10,000 bounty through its Zero Day Initiative program.

Apple on Tuesday also put out an updated version of a security update originally released last month. Version 1.1 of the 2007-004 patch repairs a couple of problems with the original fix, which may cause wireless connections to drop and allow limited FTP users access beyond their privileges on an Apple FTPServer, Apple said in another alert.

Apple's security updates are available through the Software Update application in its operating system and QuickTime software and from the Apple Web site.

More from News.com on this story's topics

Security threats

Create an email alert | RSS feed

Mac OS

Create an email alert | RSS feed

Flaws

RSS feed

Security

Create an email alert | RSS feed

Apple

Create an email alert | RSS feed

See more CNET content tagged:
Apple QuickTime, TippingPoint Technologies, Apple MacBook Pro, Apple MacBook, Apple Computer

Add a Comment (Log in or register) 22 comments (Page 1 of 1)
Hey Vegaman, where's the AV definition?
by Macsaresafer May 1, 2007 2:39 PM PDT
It's patched, and even if there were a definition for AV software, it
wouldn't have been useful for very long.
Reply to this comment
Hey everybody, look how quickly...
by Jon N. May 1, 2007 3:02 PM PDT
Look how quickly Apple gets their patches and fixes out! I've seen no one but Apple, Sun, Unix, and Linux act this quickly to patch discovered flaws. In our Windows world, unless the Highly Critical flaw is exploited, M$ usually waits until patch Tuesday!
More proof that Apple cares more about their customers.
Reply to this comment View reply
Lol
by bobmarksdale May 1, 2007 4:18 PM PDT
Wow, it took apple almost 9 days to fix a bug that was never successfully exploited in real-world conditions. Its almost like they care about the well-being of their customers. I wonder how microsucks is doing on its over 50 unpatched bugs compared to apples about 6. Hmmm...
Reply to this comment
so...
by Jesus#2 May 1, 2007 4:27 PM PDT
what's the deal.

A contest to hack a Mac.
1st day.. no winners. They make it easier...
Next day.. the only way to "hack" the Mac is to use an obscure
flaw in an application.. for both windows and Macs...
The Mac OS is still virgin... even after a $10,000 open contest..

To rub it in your face more.. Apple fixed this before it was
exploited..

what are you are going to say about Mac OS security now..
biaaaaches...
Reply to this comment
Patch deployment time comparisons
by NewsReader_ May 1, 2007 4:40 PM PDT
Yes, Apple can get a patch out quicker than MS. But why?

Does Apple care more about its users? Are Apple developers more talented than MS developers? Is Apple software easier to fix than Windows software?

We can argue for days about the answers to questions like this but no answer will expose the real reason. It is actually pretty simple IMO.

Any developer worth thier salt should be able to fix a security hole that is pointed out to them fairly quickly regardless of what company they work for. So we can agree that the patch deployment time is not affected to a great extent by the developement of a fix.

Most of the time spent in patching software is testing the patch. Microsoft clearly has a dis-advantage here because of the sheer number of deployments and configurations that must be considered. If you use Big-O notation as an anology, testing Mac software is O(N) while Windows is O(e^N). This is not an excuse for MS patch times, it is a reality of being widely deployed. Put another way, if Apple botches the Quicktime fix, it will affect many less users than if Microsoft botches an Office fix.

So you could interpret the time Microsoft spends testing patches as showing even more concern for thier customers than Apple by performing the due diligence of ensuring that the fix does not adversely affect a large number of customers rather than rushing it out just to look good in the media.
Reply to this comment View all 3 replies
Someone
by Lindy01 May 1, 2007 5:16 PM PDT
should correlate the ever increasing number of Mac OS bugs, with the rise in Apples market share and how much they spend on advertising. I bet that would be somewhat interesting. More interesting than those lame commercials that I see every where.
Reply to this comment View reply
Ironically, first time QT for Java updated since...
by dotmike May 1, 2007 6:30 PM PDT
The exploit was apparently made through the QuickTime Java
interface.

Which is ironic, because I don't think that code has been
updated since security was invented.

At least Apple responded to their developers: the developers
ignored it so so did they!

QuickTime: great APIs, but just didn't mix with Java.
Reply to this comment
And yet, NO $10,000 PAYOUT
by qprize May 1, 2007 7:03 PM PDT
Lie all you want, c|net. You've refused to put your money where
your big, fat mouth is. You haven't paid for any OS X hack, have
you?

And paying Zovi to make the laughable comment that Vista is safer
than OS X doesn't count.
Reply to this comment View reply
DON'T INSTALL
by Travis Ernst May 2, 2007 7:22 AM PDT
Those of you looking at this prior to installing the update, don't
touch it. There have been a number of us with problems since
upgrading. This is one of the rare times I wish I was like
windblows and could "'deinstall" it and go back to the prior
version.

I use a video in device (cableTV box, USB IN) and it no longer lets
the video stream live. Even recording can be iffy. Others have
reported video editing problems.

As long as your system is secure and not threatened, hold out
until you NEED to fix the problem, or if you had operating
problems with QT then upgrade. Otherwise, WAIT!!!
Reply to this comment
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement
RSS Feeds
Add headlines from CNET News.com to your homepage or feedreader.
Google
Yahoo
MSN
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Today's Top Stories
YouTube can't blame Viacom for ad woes
DailyCandy and the blogs-to-books trend
Reviewers find iPhone 3G fast, pretty, and hungry
Bank of America may finally support Firefox
DreamWorks exec on why it bumped AMD for Intel
Most Popular Stories
T-Mobile rumored to be readying Android phone for 3G launch
Photos: Supercomputing at Oak Ridge
3G iPhone up for grabs online--or is it?
Geeks get a word in with Merriam-Webster
Formula One design vet creating eco-smart city car
Markets

Market news, charts, SEC filings, and more

Related quotes

Apple (0.00%) 0.00 179.55
Dow Jones Industrials (0.00%) 0.00 11,384.21
S&P 500 (0.00%) 0.00 1,273.70
NASDAQ (0.00%) 0.00 2,294.44
CNET TECH (0.00%) 0.00 1,604.34
  Symbol Lookup
Update your drivers with Version Tracker Pro
Learn more about Version Tracker Pro

advertisement
On MovieTome: SEX AND THE CITY clips are here!
Advanced
search
Advanced
search
Visit other CBS Interactive sites