May 16, 2008 9:49 AM PDT

Senators OK $1 billion for online child porn fight

A U.S. Senate panel has unanimously approved a bill that would encourage federal, state, and local police to use and create special software designed to nab child pornography swappers on peer-to-peer file-sharing networks.

The Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday voted to send an amended version of the Combating Child Exploitation Act, chiefly sponsored by Sen. Joe Biden (D-Del.), to the full slate of politicians for a vote.

All told, the bill would allocate more than $1 billion over the next eight years for a broad array of efforts aimed at tackling Internet crimes against children. It calls for hiring 250 new federal agents at the FBI, the Immigrations and Custom Enforcement Agency, and the U.S. Postal Service dedicated to child exploitation cases; for beefing up personnel, equipment, and educational programs designed to combat Internet crimes against children; and for creating new forensics laboratories if the attorney general deems it necessary to deal with a "backlog" of online child exploitation cases.

"We need to give law enforcement the funds and the tools to pull the plug on Internet predators," Biden said in a statement.

An amendment adopted Thursday also adds new sections to the original bill that would rewrite existing child pornography laws. One section is designed to make it clear that live Webcam broadcasts of child abuse are illegal, which the bill's authors argue is an "open question." Another change is aimed at closing another perceived loophole, prohibiting digital alteration of an innocent image of a child so that sexually explicit activity is instead depicted.

It's unclear whether the changes are necessary. The Justice Department in the past, for instance, has netted guilty pleas in cases related to live Webcam recordings involving minors engaged in sexual acts.

The bill's passage follows a hearing last month at which Biden and other senators suggested they saw considerable promise in software designed to detect child pornography sources--specifically a tool called "Operation Fairplay." The so-called "comprehensive computer infrastructure" was developed two years ago by Special Agent Flint Waters in the Wyoming Attorney General's Office, where the system is still housed, and is currently being used by online child exploitation investigators nationwide.

The bill approved Thursday allocates $2 million for the attorney general to build upon that software by creating a "National Internet Crimes Against Children Data System," which would make information about ongoing cases--particularly high-priority ones--accessible to investigators nationwide and coordinate development of new software tools designed to detect alleged child predators in real time.

Through the existing Fairplay system, investigators log onto peer-to-peer file-sharing networks as any other person would and search for files containing certain keywords that are likely to indicate child pornography is involved. Then they download files--frequently videos, sometimes as long as 20 to 30 minutes, with names like "children kiddy underage illegal.mpg" and much more obscene--to their own machines. The Fairplay software allows the investigator to obtain the IP address of the file's sender and, in some cases, display its geographic location in map form.

Once armed with an IP address and date and time of the download, investigators can subpoena the Internet service provider for more information, such as name and address of the subscriber who was assigned it at that moment. It's not clear whether any wiretaps are also conducted to monitor ongoing file-swapping.

Through that process, investigators have identified more than 600,000 unique computers allegedly trafficking in child pornography and traced them to the United States. But Biden and others have voiced dismay that they're only equipped with the resources to investigate about 2 percent of those potential cases.

Recent posts from News Blog
Hitachi announces second-generation terabyte drive
Bank of America may finally embrace Firefox
Video surveillance firm gets $10 million in VC funding
DreamWorks executive on why it switched from AMD to Intel
Steady growth for Twitter, despite hiccups
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 38 comments (Page 1 of 3)
by RipR35 May 16, 2008 10:58 AM PDT
$1 billion for Child Porn and $80 billion for the Drug War. Misplaced priorities? I think so.
Reply to this comment View reply
by ReVeLaTeD May 16, 2008 12:06 PM PDT
I don't.

Drugs kill people. As perverse as child porn is, it doesn't kill anyone.
Reply to this comment
by pmfjoe May 16, 2008 12:36 PM PDT
I'll agree with ReVeLaTeD while I understand the problems associated with child porn and think the makers should end up in jail for a long long long time, I have personally seen many many more lives affected, damaged, or destroyed by illegal drugs.
Reply to this comment
by Sir Geek May 16, 2008 12:49 PM PDT
Why not spend $ 1 Billion to find the cause of why people LIKE child porn in the 1st place and try to fix the cause instead of the symptom ?

Or does that make too much sense in the long run ?
Reply to this comment View reply
by PzkwVIb May 16, 2008 1:14 PM PDT
Oh great, another "It's for the CHILDREN initiative." Rather then solving real, relevant and and pervasive problems, politicians take the political cheap shot. I have the feeling that the amount of kiddy porn out there is minuscule compared to all of the other problems Congress should be solving. Bravo! The Senate once again proves itself to be full of gutless political hacks.
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
by yacahuma May 16, 2008 1:33 PM PDT
Again , no one here seem to care about the actual children. Drug users do it because the want to. I am pretty sure kids are force to this. I will put 80 billion fightting kid porn and let the drug users die.
Reply to this comment
by unknown unknown May 16, 2008 1:41 PM PDT
Drugs kill people, but then so do legal substances like tobacco and alcohol. Besides with regard to drugs, people usually have a choice whether to stat using them or not. As for the war on drugs, it's a sick joke. I have no doubt congress like these bills because tough on child predators is the latest rage. Unlike the drugs, children don't get a choice and results can lead to behavioral problems, depression, and suicide among others. There are cases were the child has been killed buy their abuser.
Reply to this comment View reply
by richto May 16, 2008 1:45 PM PDT
I guess you have never heard of Lolita then.
Reply to this comment
by Pete Bardo May 16, 2008 2:59 PM PDT
Sound a lot like the RIAA program to find copyrighted material offered for free download illegally. This whole scheme could be taken down by file sharers misleadingly naming files "illegal child porn.mpg". Or name them "Illegal copy of music by the artist formerly known as Prince.mp4".

Then we'll be paying agents to watch kiddie-porn. Maybe some of the predators could get jobs there--they know what to look for!
Reply to this comment
by humanssssss May 16, 2008 3:08 PM PDT
Disclaimer:
These are my opinions. If you don't like it. Don't read. I am not responsible for any actions or damage as a result to my opinions. Don't blame me if you read what I have to say. You have every right to do something else beside reading my opinions.

Americans are obsess with restricting sex. From making prostitution illegal to revoke the rights of an individual to view child pornography to the ability of an individual to alter image to suggest child pornography. Why do we prohibit these 1st amendment right that everyone wants so much? Because we are idiots. When it comes to hurt you, then you will realize these laws are as stupid as the people who wanted it to be enacted.

My position is this. Viewing and possessing child pornography should not be criminalize. The people who make child pornography through use of non-consensual means should be prosecuted for the crime of forcing children to have sex. But if the children consent, I don't see the harm in this.

Sex to many Americans are something of a taboo. If you were to go to other part of the countries which has more people than the US, they have sex even as young as 10 years old. Do they think child pornography is illegal? Doubt it.

The age that the law consider a child is 18. Kids go through puberty at 12 now a day. Unlike 10 years ago, kids go through puberty at 14. Laws should take into consideration science more specifically evolution. Many law makers and many people never took a Biology class. That's why we have stupid laws. Laws that only cater to the mob that "think" they know best when in actuality, they are hypocrites when the laws are on them, and they go on a crusade to change the law.
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
1 | 2 | 3 | Next 10 Comments >>
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement
  • About News Blog

  • Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader
Google
Yahoo
MSN

Most popular stories

  1. Photos: Top 10 newly discovered species

  2. T-Mobile rumored to be readying Android phone for 3G launch

  3. 3G iPhone up for grabs online--or is it?

  4. Formula One design vet creating eco-smart city car

  5. Geeks get a word in with Merriam-Webster

Latest tech news headlines

Featured blogs

Beyond Binary by Ina Fried

Coop's Corner by Charles Cooper

Defense in Depth by Robert Vamosi

Geek Gestalt by Daniel Terdiman

Green Tech

One More Thing by Tom Krazit

Outside the Lines by Dan Farber

The Iconoclast by Declan McCullagh

The Social by Caroline McCarthy

Underexposed by Stephen Shankland

advertisement
On TechRepublic: 19 words you don't want in your resume
Advanced
search
Advanced
search
Visit other CBS Interactive sites