May 1, 2008 3:08 PM PDT

After unprofitable quarter, Sun to cut jobs

Update 4:02 p.m. PT: I corrected the revenue Sun reported for the quarter. It was $3.266 billion. Update 3:11 p.m. PT: I added more detail on Sun's employee total and after-hours trading.

IBM, Intel, and Google have been immune to the economic slowdown, but Sun Microsystems wasn't.

The server and software company on Thursday announced grim results for its fiscal third quarter, which ended March 30, that showed declining revenue and a swing to a net loss.

Sun Chief Financial Officer Mike Lehman also said the company will cut 1,500 to 2,500 jobs. The company had 34,400 employees at the end of the quarter.

"The U.S. economy presented Sun with significant challenges in the third quarter, masking our progress in developing nations and economies across the world," said Chief Executive Jonathan Schwartz in a statement.

Sun reported a net loss of $34 million, or 4 cents per share, a decline from net income of $67 million in the year-earlier quarter; the figure includes charges of about 4 cents per share from the acquisition of open-source database company MySQL. Revenue decreased $17 million to $3.266 billion, a notch below the $3.4 billion expected by analysts surveyed by Thomson Financial.

In after-hours trading, Sun's stock dropped $2.48, or 15 percent, to $13.85.

In addition, Lehman stepped back from a financial goal it set in 2007 after declaring Sun had "turned the corner." The company then had aimed for operating margin, a measure of profitability, of 10 percent for fiscal 2009, but Lehman said on Thursday that Sun now is aiming for "at least 7 percent." Lehman blamed the economy, but the figure also was reduced because of MySQL operational costs.

"It's fair to say we're disappointed we're not able to go after the operating margin targets we set two years ago," Lehman said. "It would be damaging to the long-term health of the company to hit an arbitrary number."

Recent posts from News Blog
iPhone 3G queue forms in Manhattan
Privacy advocates praise Google's new link
Ask.com closes Dictionary.com deal
1 euro eBay baby goes home
VeriSign names interim CEO
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 11 comments (Page 1 of 1)
Does Sun's business model make sense?
by dargon19888 May 1, 2008 6:23 PM PDT
While Sun is doing great with their new chips and servers, does their overall business model make sense? Does purchasing MySQL make sense? Not really. One has to question how they are planning on generating revenue on things...
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
New CEO needed
by DigitalScience2 May 1, 2008 7:04 PM PDT
Jonathan Schwartz might be sharp with computers, but his ego is outsized and Sun needs someone seasoned enough to deal with this turnaround. Otherwise, stay tuned for more of the same, or worse.
Reply to this comment
We're the "dot" in "idiot"
by estie2007 May 1, 2008 7:22 PM PDT
Seriously...why is this company still in business?
Reply to this comment View reply
open letter to Sun board
by simpleton777 May 2, 2008 10:53 AM PDT
http://www.247wallst.com/2008/05/sun-microsyst-1.html
Reply to this comment
Typical Wall-Street Greed is at fault.
by chash360 May 2, 2008 11:06 AM PDT
Every publically traded company is probably feeling the pains of the economy. But that is not the whole problem. The first reaction of many of these companies is to start making cuts, to satisfy the stockholders, regardless of what it does to the business. Because after all the BOD's (Board of Directors) of most of these companies, do not depend upon or care about the business itself, or the customers, or the employees, they care about how much money they can rake into their stock value, before the company goes under. Most of them are intentionally not employees for this reason. There really is no such thing as a true investor these days with publically traded companies, they just want and wait for the stock to go up so they can sell it for profit, thats not investing, thats a day trader parasite. I see it happen in every industry, if you don't do what Wall-Street expects or wants, they start to kill off your ability to do it in the future to save their own pockets. Granted that going into unprofitability, may mean this is the right, or at least necessary descision for Sun, but this happens all the time in completely profitable companies, that don't meet Wall-Street's expectations for profit and growth. For Wall-Street its not good enough that you make a steady reliable profit, year after year, if you don't grow that profit, at a rate that makes them lots of money, they can, and will kill your business to save themselves, because they do not want to have to actually work for a living. Productive work is the only thing that creates real value, something they seem to know little about, when all they do is try to build imaginary confidence in shuffling numbers around.
Reply to this comment View reply
Powered by Jive Software
  • About News Blog

  • Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader
Google
Yahoo
MSN

Most popular stories

  1. Photos: Army designates year's best inventions

  2. Photos: Cracking Open the Apple Macintosh Classic

  3. Photos: Top 10 reviews of the week

  4. Source: Protective order will keep Viacom out of sensitive YouTube user data

  5. Stolen: Google employees' personal data

Latest tech news headlines

Featured blogs

Beyond Binary by Ina Fried

Coop's Corner by Charles Cooper

Defense in Depth by Robert Vamosi

Geek Gestalt by Daniel Terdiman

Green Tech

One More Thing by Tom Krazit

Outside the Lines by Dan Farber

The Iconoclast by Declan McCullagh

The Social by Caroline McCarthy

Underexposed by Stephen Shankland

advertisement
On GameSpot: Wii Fit tells 10-year-old she's fat
Advanced
search
Advanced
search
Visit other CBS Interactive sites