October 30, 2007 4:43 AM PDT

Google's love for solar may extend to other renewables

BOSTON--When it comes to bragging rights and solar power, Google's on top: it has the largest corporate installation of solar-powered electricity yet.

But that apparently is just the beginning. The search giant is also considering other forms of renewable energy, according to Robyn Beavers, the director of environmental programs at Google. Google intends to generate 50 megawatts of electricity from renewable forms for its operations by 2012.

Google founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin charge a plug-in beneath its solar-powered car port.

(Credit: Google)

Beavers spoke at the Conference on Clean Energy here on Monday where she outlined a number of initiatives that Google participates in aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

Those include the 1.6 megawatt solar installation at its corporate headquarters in Mountain View, Calif. In addition to panels on building roofs, Google has constructed a car port with solar panels as a roof, under which people can charge up plug-in hybrids.

Asked whether Google was considering wind power, Beavers said she couldn't say. But she didn't leave much doubt that all forms of renewable energy are actively under consideration.

"Wind, solar, geothermal, fuel cells--you name it, we're looking into it," she said.

Corporate buyers are prized customers for the thousands of clean-tech start-ups that have cropped up over the past few years. Wal-Mart's decision to invest in solar has been a closely watched move and indicator of solar power demand.

Renewable energy projects like solar, wind or biomass can be financially interesting to businesses because they typically allow companies to get a contract with fixed energy prices, which acts as a hedge against rising rates.

In the case of Google, which consumes a lot of electricity to power its operations and data centers, its investment in solar electricity will pay for itself in seven and a half years. Its consumption from the grid has been reduced by 30 percent and its bills cut down a lot more than 30 percent, Beavers said.

Recent posts from News Blog
Ask.com closes Dictionary.com deal
1 euro eBay baby goes home
VeriSign names interim CEO
EA debuts new family, sports games for Wii, PlayStation
Daily Debrief: Celebrating America's independence, questioning our own online
Good.
by billmosby October 30, 2007 5:44 AM PDT
Did they offset the extra heat absorption characteristics of the cells by providing a bit of reflectivity to go along with it?
Reply to this comment
next up: 1.21 gigawatts of power by 2030
by ColdMast October 30, 2007 8:30 AM PDT
- wink
Reply to this comment
Good news, bad story
by shynes October 30, 2007 8:46 AM PDT
The assertion that google has cut its power consumption from "the grid" by 30% is simply and obviously wrong. Today, google probably consumes over 1000 MW continuous draw, and this will probably double in the next 3 years. Loud applause for the alternative efforts, but please don't overstate the result. Steve Hynes
Reply to this comment
Google's still just a search engine..
by imacpwr October 30, 2007 9:13 AM PDT
with more money than they know what to do with. How long will it be before the bubble bursts and they'd wish they hadn't tossed so much out the window..?
Reply to this comment
Energy consumption
by Kimsh October 30, 2007 10:33 AM PDT
Oh please, grid consumption down 30% and they are talking abotu reaching 50 MWatts in 2012. 50 MWatts is not 30% of the consumption of one large data center. This continual numbers and publicity game from Google is getting lame. If this is not a disasterous misquote then the Google guys are full of it. Maybe they don't include the data centers at all, cos really at 1.5% of the total power produced in the US, and climbing, they don't really matter huh?
Reply to this comment
Google was wrong to put solar panels on their roof.
by Manhattan2 October 30, 2007 10:47 AM PDT
Sure Google got good press from their WORLDS LARGEST INSTALLATION but it was done in error. Google is smart enough to run the numbers. Tax breaks and state and federal incentives may have made the solar panel installation more appealing to Google but what they did was a mistake. We sent over emails before the installation to no avail. A smarter solar installation using a solar transfer for the same invested dollar could have earned them 2-3 times more CO2 reduction than they got with their rooftop installation. In this case it could have been about PR but if companies really want to make a difference explore a Solar Transfer! Google Solar Transfer and you will find more. Tell the Google execs it is not too late, we can fix their error.
Reply to this comment View reply
Vaporware or scam?
by skrubol October 30, 2007 12:33 PM PDT
I still haven't decided which solartransfer is. Two things it's not is a product which is available today, and a product which has real research behind it.
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
Solar
by spothannah October 31, 2007 5:04 AM PDT
Is anybody looking at Albedo footprint as opposed to Carbon footprint?
Reply to this comment View reply
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement
  • About News Blog

  • Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader
Google
Yahoo
MSN

Most popular stories

  1. 'Netflix box' to carry more than just Netflix

  2. Jobs, Apple directors face new backdating suit

  3. IE 8 to have antimalware protection

  4. China's military tries out Segways

  5. Stolen: Google employees' personal data

Latest tech news headlines

Featured blogs

Beyond Binary by Ina Fried

Coop's Corner by Charles Cooper

Defense in Depth by Robert Vamosi

Geek Gestalt by Daniel Terdiman

Green Tech

One More Thing by Tom Krazit

Outside the Lines by Dan Farber

The Iconoclast by Declan McCullagh

The Social by Caroline McCarthy

Underexposed by Stephen Shankland

advertisement
On TV.com: JESSICA ALBA photos
Advanced
search
Advanced
search
Visit other CBS Interactive sites